It is my great pleasure to present this guest blog post by my colleague Cate Frazier-Neely. She has been a long time supporter of this blog and I am thrilled to have the opportunity to share her ideas with my readership. Her interest in the impetus to sing is an area that is not always discussed in pedagogical circles with a predilection for more quantifiable scientific data. I hope readers will enjoy her ideas, and wish everyone a very happy holiday season and a successful 2020! -Justin
“The willingness with which a singer responds to the energy charge when the throat opens will determine his ultimate potential for mastering a vocal technique that is functionally free. This means facing up to the fear and anxiety that are ever present throughout the formative stages of training. No other phase of the learning process is quite as important as this. How the singer meets this challenge will determine whether or not his artistic ambitions will be realized…Since anxiety is so intimately bound up with physical contraction and fear of movement, one of the major problems during training is to break down the student’s innate dread of inner expression…”Cornelius Reid (1911-2008)
I first discovered Cornelius Reid’s trilogy (The Free Voice, Bel Canto in Principle and Practice and Voice: Psyche and Soma) in graduate school. I resonated deeply with each of these books. Reid’s work, and the work of those who’ve developed his concepts in registration and the role of the psyche in singing since then have formed a basis for the unusual variety and depth of my life’s work.
All teachers of singing need to viscerally understand that histories of vocal pedagogy and of oral musical traditions don’t just change with time. They both have an eternal quality of circling back to embrace roots and then burst forward again in new growth. One feeds the other and around they go, like a wagon wheel moving along the singing trail. They weed out, add to and hold fast – not so much by specific exercises – but by underlying principles, overarching concepts and use of language.
Recently, the above Reid paragraph struck me in a new way. He wrote: “The willingness with which the singer responds to the energy charge when the throat opens….”
What?? What does Reid mean by “willingness to respond to the energy charge when the throat opens?” First of all, he refers to the throat opening as a response to the energy charge. The energy charge comes first! Singing doesn’t even start with the breath or “inhalation.” The throat doesn’t initially open by “creating space,” “placement” or even by getting into character or poetic understanding. It isn’t shaped by “lifting the soft palate,” or “lowering,” “raising,” “tilting” (or whatever-ing) the larynx, or by supporting with the intercostals or transverse abdominals or skilled use of the articulators.
Reid suggests that the initiation of things ‘happening’ is dependent upon how much a person is willing to respond to “The Charge.”
One of my primary voice teachers, Elizabeth Daniels, spoke about “the thing” that happens before you even breathe to sing, and how, if anyone identifies “the thing” they’ll win a Nobel Prize. Daniels’ teacher was Todd Duncan, George Gershwin’s hand-picked Porgy for the premier of Porgy and Bess. Duncan evidently used to say that the way the throat is responding before the breath is taken will determine the freedom of the singing afterwards. And my father, a brilliant and loving full-time church musician, used to say “Cultivate a belly of fire, an open heart and a mind of ice.” And maybe one of the most unique things a teacher can do in our current day and age is help clear a singer’s charge and free it from static so that functional training can take root.
The “energy charge,” to which Reid refers has not been measured by science, but is the result of the urge to sound, or express, as part of our natural makeup up as bioelectric beings. There are many kinds of energy, or electrical phenomena produced within living organisms and within the earth itself.
The late Dr. Meribeth Dayme wrote in the third edition of her book Dynamics of the Singing Voice:
J. Diamond (1983) has defined “life energy” as being a vital force that is physical, mental and spiritual in nature: the physical being reflected in the muscular activity and the functioning of the skeletal system: the mental including thoughts and the ability to be centered; and the spiritual that begins as spirit which is signified by the love and humanity within each person. He has also noted that everything in the environment, both physical and psychic–thoughts, feelings, desires affects life energy.
(Diamond’s trilogy examines this life energy in The Life Energy in Music, vol. I, II, and III. New York: Archaeus Press)
I believe that this is all part of the unencumbered charge to which Reid refers. Or to put it another way, what is The Charge free of? Reid gives us an answer: it is free of anxiety.
Voice and acting teachers, actors, dancers, singers, and healers have been weaving together somatic re-education, movement, mindfulness, nutrition and wellness, bodywork, rehabilitative tools, and intention for over forty-five years now. These ways of uniting the mind-body split in our culture help to heal and repair our willingness and ability to respond to The Charge. It’s that initial thing that has to be allowed before we release and engage our body’s pressure systems to breathe. Yes, the “charge” is our response to life, music, our mission, our joy, our motivation. But it also must be free enough to allow all the ‘things’ that we observe in voice science (including whatever latest research has been reported!) and continually define and redefine in vocal pedagogy to work.
The emotions we feel aren’t the same thing as the energy charge that Reid mentions. It seems to me that many singers are vocally reflecting the angst of the times, rather than establishing how to deliver expression of angst without having the throat shaped by anxiety. Teachers, mentors, coaches, producers, conductors and directors should help to create an environment that supports The Charge. But since that is not always the case, part of a singer’s training must develop a willingness to respond with their own charge, within themselves. Each singer, as they mature throughout their lives, carries the responsibility of protecting their own Charge so that functional training can take root over time and release a naturally musical and expressive soul.
Reid’s next sentence is,
This means facing up to the fear and anxiety that are ever present throughout the formative stages of training. No other phase of the learning process is quite as important as this. How the singer meets this challenge will determine whether or not his artistic ambitions will be realized.
This is where we do get a bit of historical pedagogy root rot, because it’s not only in the formative stages of training that this may occur, but can occur at regular intervals throughout our artistic adult lives as we grow, change and navigate life. We can become disconnected from our spirits and learning to listen to our bodies as the Ultimate Wisdom. Sometimes what our bodies are telling us is in direct conflict with what we’ve built in our careers and private lives, and in direct conflict with our motivations. This conflict, by itself, will warp “the charge.”
His final words of the paragraph are:
Since anxiety is so intimately bound up with physical contraction and fear of movement, one of the major problems during training is to break down the student’s innate dread of inner expression…
We’re brought back to the rise of somatic tools, dance, all kinds of advances in healing, to aid release of physical contraction and fear of movement. We cannot solve the student’s anxiety—that is their journey.
We can only journey through our own limitations, freeing ourselves in huge and tiny ways as we go. And that is how we free the charge in the students and groups with which we work.
I sing the body electric,-Walt Whitman
The armies of those I love engirth me and I engirth them,
They will not let me off till I go with them, respond to them,
And discorrupt them, and charge them full with the charge of the soul….
Since 1980, Cate Frazier-Neely, MM, BM, has been an early adapter and creative in the fields of vocal pedagogy, somatic education, performance, health & wellness and community education. Her versatility and musicianship are reflected in reviews from her 25 year career as a singer, complete CV, and through about 8,000 singers that she has worked within her lifetime so far. (These are 1:1 and in person group sessions–not a Youtube or social media number!) While working together, singers have appeared on Broadway, earned contracts with Cirque de Soleil, Disney Tokyo, Washington Opera and Virginia Opera, performed in major jazz venues and toured the US, Europe and Russia and won Grammy Awards in Music Education and Sound Engineering.
She worked many years privately and as a guest clinician with middle school and high school age singers in her community, and child actors in the music and theater industries. Along the way she founded four arts’ organizations to fill educational and performance needs for singers, including The Washington Vocal Consortium, The Levine Women’s Choruses, Singer’s Centre for Girls and the Amoroso Chamber Consort, a touring and award-winning contemporary music ensemble. (from 1986 through 2015.)
Cate now works in the field of singing voice rehabilitation, partnering with SLP’s in Johns Hopkins’ Department of Neck and Head Surgery, and teaches a reduced private lesson schedule. She is also co-authoring, with Nancy Bos and Joanne Hayes Bozeman, Singing Through Change: Women’s Voices in Midlife, Menopause and Beyond, to be published in spring, 2020 by Studio Bos Media. She is also featured, along with 20 other voice experts from around the world, in Dr. Elizabeth Benson’s new Compton Press book, “Training Contemporary and Commercial Music Singers.”
Two new unique programs are available to fill needs that Cate perceives in voice teacher and singer experiences: Collegial Consults is a 1:2 working lab for experienced voice teachers and their students who don’t have access to good SLP’s or singing voice rehabilitation specialists. The Alchemy of Teaching Singing is a 1:1 experiential learning deep dive program outside of academia. This program allowing teachers and singers time to absorb information, have it become visceral and complete a project of their choosing. Guest pedagogues, community involvement and evaluations provide a flow of practical advice and inspiration.
2 thoughts on “Guest Contributor Cate Frazier-Neely: The Energy of the Singing Impetus”
I so appreciated your reference to “historical pedagogy root rot”. As a non singing teacher and a dedicated amateur singer, I still follow vocal pedagogy as a means of gaining an understanding of my own psychology and expression.
I’m heartened to hear that even though I’m long past my “formative stages of training”, I can still realize additional layers of artistry. You very eloquently pointed this out. (Yes, I too am a fan of Cornelius Reid.)
Loved the post! Adding, if one doesn’t stop the breath somewhere, as in the sternum area, as in breath from lungs pressed into the sternum, all the charge in world, if not balanced by this or a similar action, will potentially go to places above the collar bones which makes controlled artistic singing impossible.